| United States Patent Application |
20140194997
|
| Kind Code
|
A1
|
|
Carignan; Roger
;   et al.
|
July 10, 2014
|
MARKING TEMPLATE FOR INSTALLING A CUSTOM REPLACEMENT DEVICE FOR
RESURFACING A FEMUR AND ASSOCIATED INSTALLATION METHOD
Abstract
A replacement device for resurfacing a joint surface of a femur and a
method of making and installing such a device is provided. The custom
replacement device is designed to substantially fit the trochlear groove
surface, of an individual femur, thereby creating a "customized"
replacement device for that individual femur and maintaining the original
kinematics of the joint. The top surface is designed so as to maintain
centrally directed tracking of the patella perpendicular to the plane
established by the distal end of the femoral condyles and aligned with
the center of the femoral head.
| Inventors: |
Carignan; Roger; (Williams, AZ)
; Pratt; Clyde R.; (Somis, CA)
|
| Applicant: | | Name | City | State | Country | Type | KINAMED, INC. | Camarillo | CA | US
| | |
| Assignee: |
KINAMED, INC.
Camarillo
CA
|
| Family ID:
|
24104367
|
| Appl. No.:
|
14/206494
|
| Filed:
|
March 12, 2014 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
| | | | |
|
| Application Number | Filing Date | Patent Number | |
|---|
| | 13096868 | Apr 28, 2011 | | |
| | 14206494 | | | |
| | 12120581 | May 14, 2008 | 7935150 | |
| | 13096868 | | | |
| | 11030868 | Jan 7, 2005 | 7517365 | |
| | 12120581 | | | |
| | 10712436 | Nov 12, 2003 | 6905514 | |
| | 11030868 | | | |
| | 09528128 | Mar 17, 2000 | 6712856 | |
| | 10712436 | | | |
|
|
| Current U.S. Class: |
623/20.35 |
| Current CPC Class: |
A61B 17/00491 20130101; A61F 2002/4658 20130101; A61F 2/30767 20130101; A61F 2/30942 20130101; A61F 2/3877 20130101; A61F 2002/30125 20130101; A61F 2002/30594 20130101; A61F 2002/30685 20130101; A61F 2002/30892 20130101; A61F 2002/30948 20130101; A61F 2002/30952 20130101; A61F 2002/30957 20130101; A61F 2230/0008 20130101; A61F 2310/00017 20130101; A61F 2310/00023 20130101; A61F 2310/00029 20130101; A61F 2310/00203 20130101; A61F 2310/00239 20130101; A61F 2310/00407 20130101; A61F 2310/00796 20130101; Y10S 623/901 20130101; A61F 2/3859 20130101; A61F 2/461 20130101; Y10T 29/49764 20150115; A61B 34/10 20160201; A61B 2034/108 20160201; A61F 2/4657 20130101; A61B 17/1764 20130101 |
| Class at Publication: |
623/20.35 |
| International Class: |
A61F 2/38 20060101 A61F002/38 |
Claims
1. An instrument comprising: a body, the body including a femoral
contacting side, the femoral contacting side having a three-dimensional
shape configured to match at least a portion of a distal-anterior portion
of a femur of a particular patient; and a surgical tool guide, the
surgical tool guide being customized for the particular patient whereby
the surgical tool guide is in a pre-defined spatial arrangement with the
three dimensional shape of the femoral contacting side.
2. The instrument of claim 1, wherein the femoral contacting side is
pre-operatively configured to continuously match in shape a region of a
femoral trochlea spanning from a medial side of the femoral trochlea to a
lateral side of the femoral trochlea.
3. The instrument of claim 1, wherein the surgical tool guide comprises
at least two drill guides configured to guide the formation of pin
receiving openings in a distal portion of the femur of the particular
patient.
4. The instrument of claim 1, wherein the femoral contacting side is a
contiguous surface and is configured to contiguously match in shape to a
femoral trochlea of the particular patient.
5. The instrument of claim 1, wherein the body defines an outer boundary
surface configured to indicate an outer boundary of a femoral implant
relative to the femur of the particular patient.
6. The instrument of claim 1, wherein the femoral contacting side is
configured to match the particular patient's femoral trochlea surface to
establish a pre-defined spatial arrangement of the instrument relative to
an axis of the particular patient.
7. The instrument of claim 1, wherein the femoral contacting side has a
shape that is configured to match a subchondral bone surface of the
femoral trochlea of the particular patient.
8. The instrument of claim 1, wherein the femoral contacting side is
generally concavely shaped in an anterior-posterior dimension and
generally convexly shaped in a medial-lateral dimension.
9. An instrument for use during an implant procedure and customized for a
particular patient, the instrument comprising: a body, the body including
an articular region contacting surface, the articular region contacting
surface having a three-dimensional shape configured to match at least a
portion of a subchondral bone surface in a distal-anterior portion of a
femur of the particular patient; and a surgical tool guide, the surgical
tool guide being customized for the particular patient whereby the
surgical tool guide is in a pre-defined spatial arrangement with the
three dimensional shape of the articular region contacting surface.
10. The instrument of claim 9, wherein the articular region contacting
surface is configured to match in shape at least a bottom portion of a
trochlear groove of the particular patient.
11. The instrument of claim 10, wherein the articular region contacting
surface is further configured to match in shape an anterior portion of
the femur of the particular patient.
12. The instrument of claim 10, wherein the articular region contacting
surface is configured to match in shape at least a portion of a trochlea
of the distal femur of the particular patient, the portion spanning the
trochlea from a medial side to a lateral side of the trochlea.
13. The instrument of claim 9, wherein the articular region contacting
surface is configured to match in shape at least a portion of an area of
an anterior-distal femur of the particular patient between two condyles
of the distal femur.
14. The instrument of claim 9, wherein the articular region contacting
surface is configured to match in shape at least a portion of an area of
an anterior-distal femur of the particular patient between a superior
edge of a cartilage surface and a point of attachment of an anterior
cruciate ligament.
15. An instrument for use during an implant procedure and customized for
a particular patient, the instrument comprising: a body, the body
including an articular region contacting surface, the articular region
contacting surface having a three-dimensional shape configured to match
at least a portion of a cartilage surface in a distal-anterior portion of
a femur of the particular patient; and a surgical tool guide, the
surgical tool guide being customized for the particular patient whereby
the surgical tool guide is in a pre-defined spatial arrangement with the
three dimensional shape of the articular region contacting surface.
16. The instrument of claim 15, wherein the articular region contacting
surface is configured to match in shape at least a portion of a
distal-anterior portion of the particular patient's femur in an area
inferior to a distal-anterior superior edge of the cartilage surface of
the particular patient.
17. The instrument of claim 15, wherein the articular region contacting
surface is configured to match in shape at least a portion of a
distal-anterior portion of the particular patient's femur in a defined
spatial arrangement relative to an axis of the femur of the particular
patient.
18. The instrument of claim 15, wherein the articular region contacting
surface is configured to match in shape to a trochlear groove of the
particular patient's femur in a defined spatial arrangement relative to
an axis of the femur that extends through a center of a femoral head of
the particular patient.
19. An instrument for use during an implant procedure and customized for
a particular patient, the instrument comprising: a body and a surgical
tool guide, the body comprising a femoral contacting side, the femoral
contacting side configured to match in shape at least a portion of a
distal-anterior portion of a femur of the particular patient.
20. The instrument of claim 19, wherein the femoral contacting side is a
surface that is configured to match in shape at least a portion of a
subchondral bone surface of the distal-anterior portion of the particular
patient's femur.
21. The instrument of claim 19, wherein the femoral contacting side
includes a surface configured to fit into a trochlear groove of the
particular patient's femur.
22. The instrument of claim 21, wherein the surface configured to fit
into the trochlear groove is configured to match in shape the trochlear
groove of the particular patient's femur.
23. The instrument of claim 19, wherein the femoral contacting side is
configured to match in shape the distal-anterior portion of the
particular patient in a defined spatial arrangement relative to cartilage
of the particular patient's distal femur.
24. The instrument of claim 19, wherein the surgical tool guide comprises
a hole or a slot extending through the body of the instrument.
25. The instrument of claim 19, wherein the surgical tool guide comprises
a plurality of holes extending through the body of the instrument.
26. The instrument of claim 19, wherein the surgical tool guide comprises
at least one hole extending through the body of the instrument, the at
least one hole configured to guide a drill for drilling an opening in the
femur of the particular patient.
27. The instrument of claim 19, wherein the surgical tool guide comprises
at least one hole extending through the body of the instrument, the at
least one hole configured to facilitate positioning at least one pin in
the femur of the particular patient.
28. The instrument of claim 19, wherein the instrument comprises a
marking template.
Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application is a Continuation of U.S. utility application Ser.
No. 13/096,868, filed Apr. 28, 2011, still pending, which is a
Continuation of U.S. utility application Ser. No. 12/120,581, filed May
14, 2008, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,935,150, which is a Continuation
of U.S. utility application Ser. No. 11/030,868, filed Jan. 7, 2005, now
issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,517,365, which is a Divisional of U.S. utility
application Ser. No. 10/712,436, filed Nov. 12, 2003, now issued as U.S.
Pat. No. 6,905,514, which is a Divisional of U.S. utility application
Ser. No. 09/528,128, filed Mar. 17, 2000, now issued as U.S. Pat. No.
6,712,856, the contents of all of which are herein incorporated by
reference in their entirety.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] 1. Field of Invention
[0003] The invention relates generally to a replacement device for a knee
joint, and more particularly, to a device for resurfacing the trochlear
groove of a femur that is customized to an individual and to methods for
installing and making the same.
[0004] 2. Description of the Related Art
[0005] The human knee joint primarily includes three parts, anatomically
referred to as the femur (thighbone), the tibia (shinbone) and the
patella (kneecap). The knee joint is then further subdivided into two
joints: the patella-femoral joint (space between the kneecap and distal
anterior surface of the thighbone) and the tibia-femoral (space between
the thighbone and shinbone).
[0006] During normal bending and straightening of the leg, the patella
(kneecap) slides over the femur (thighbone) within a groove that is
located on the front distal surface of the femur. This groove is referred
to as the trochlear groove. Several types of abnormalities can occur with
the movement of the patella over the femur. For example, the patella may
dislocate or slip out of place, it may fracture, or develop a tracking
problem. Normally, the patella tracks, or glides within the central
region of the trochlear groove. A tracking problem occurs when the
patella no longer remains centered within the groove as it glides over
the femur. The resulting abnormal biomechanics can cause chronic pain in
the joint and if left untreated, it can lead to degenerative arthritis.
[0007] The distal end of the femur (within which resides the trochlear
groove) is covered with articular cartilage. This cartilage functions as
a cushion between the femur and the tibia. In arthritis of the knee
joint, the articular cartilage breaks down, either from abnormal wear as
mentioned above, or from injury, age, congenital predisposition,
inflammatory arthritis, or obesity, etc. When this cartilage breaks down,
the cushion is lost, resulting in pain, swelling, bone spur formation
and/or decreased range of motion of the knee joint.
[0008] Due to the inability of damaged cartilage to repair itself after
injury, the range of treatment for patients with unicompartmental disease
involving the patella is limited. The most commonly prescribed treatments
included soft tissue releases and/or realignment of the patellar tendon,
patellectomy, where the patella is completely removed, or a total knee
replacement with a standardized patello-femoral-tibial prosthesis. In
certain instances none of these procedures may be desirable or effective.
For example, the soft tissue procedures may not work. A patient having
undergone a patellectomy is left partially crippled due to the loss of
the kneecap, which served to hold the joint together. Additionally, these
patients often still suffer from pain due to contact of the remaining
tendon moving directly over the groove. A total knee replacement with a
standardized prosthesis is also far from ideal because much of the femur
bone must be carved away in order to "fit" the distal surface of the
femur to the standardized prosthesis. Additionally, the patients are
often young and are likely to require replacement of the prosthesis. Each
revision operation is more difficult. Therefore, there still is a need
for a better treatment of patients with degenerative arthritis of their
patella-femoral joint.
[0009] The present invention provides a replacement device that is
customized to each individual knee joint. Due to the "fitting" of the
replacement device to the patient's femur, instead of the reverse as is
the case with standard prosthetic devices, the patient's original range
and force of motion (kinematics) through the knee joint is preserved and
the patient does not suffer from device-related pain. Also included is a
method for making a customized replacement device and a marking template
for such a device. Bone stock removal is limited and functionally is
maximized.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0010] The present invention is directed toward a custom replacement
device for resurfacing an articulating or joint surface of the femur and
methods of making and installing such a device. This custom replacement
device overcomes the problems associated with prior knee joint
replacement devices or prostheses in that it is made specifically to fit
the trochlear groove surface (surface over which the patella slides) of a
femur from an individual patient. Thereby creating a "customized"
replacement device for that individual femur.
[0011] The replacement device is substantially defined by four outer
points and first and second surface areas. The first of four points is
defined approximately as being 3 to 5 mm from the point of attachment of
the anterior cruciate ligament to the femur. The second point is defined
approximately at or near the superior edge of the end of the natural
cartilage. The third point is defined approximately at the top ridge of
the right condyle. The fourth point is defined approximately at the top
ridge of the left condyle. The first surface area is customized to
substantially match the bone surface area of the trochlear groove of the
femur. The second surface area has a tracking path that is approximately
perpendicular to the end of the condyles of the femur. The thickness
between the first and second surface areas may be approximately between 2
mm and 6 mm. To couple the replacement device to the femur, a pin
protruding from the first surface area may be used to penetrate an
opening in the femur prepared by a surgeon. Boney ingrowth may secure the
prosthesis or bone cement may be used.
[0012] The replacement device can also include a customized drill guide
that is substantially defined by first and second surface areas. The
first surface area is customized to the surface area of the trochlear
groove of the femur. The second surface area includes a hole that is
aligned substantially to the pin to assist in drilling the opening into
the femur for the pin.
[0013] In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, these and
other objectives are accomplished by providing a replacement device
having a top surface; a bottom surface; the bottom surface substantially
formed to match the trochlear groove surface of a femur; and the top
surface substantially tracking the trochlear groove of the femur.
[0014] In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, these
objectives are accomplished by providing a system for installing a
replacement device to a distal end of a femur having a trochlear groove
surface, comprising: a marking template, wherein: the marking template
has a back side substantially matching the distal end of a femur; and an
opening through the marking template; a drilling apparatus to form a hole
on the distal end of the femur assisted by the opening in the marking
template; and a replacement device, wherein: the replacement device has a
bottom side substantially matching the distal end of the femur; and a pin
protruding from the bottom side of the replacement device adapted to
insert into the hole on the distal end of the femur.
[0015] In accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention,
these objectives are accomplished by providing a method of making a
replacement device, comprising the steps of: forming a model of a distal
end of a patient's femur; forming a first mold from the model, wherein
the first mold has a bottom side that substantially matches the trochlear
groove of the patient's femur, wherein the first mold has a top side
opposite of the bottom side; coupling a peg on a predetermined location
on the bottom side of the first mold; shaping the top side of the mold to
substantially track the trochlear groove of the patient's femur; forming
a second mold from the first mold; and pouring viscous material into the
second mold to make a replacement device.
[0016] In accordance with still another aspect of the present invention,
these objectives are accomplished by providing a replacement device
having a bottom side that substantially matches the trochlear groove of a
patient's femur, wherein the bottom side of the replacement device has a
pin at a predetermined location; providing a marking template having a
back side that substantially matches the trochlear groove of the
patient's femur, wherein the marking template has an opening
corresponding to the predetermined location of the pin; removing the
cartilage from the distal end of the femur; positioning the marking
template about the femur substantially similar to the desired installed
position of the replacement device; drilling a hole on the distal end of
the femur though the opening of the marking template; removing the
marking template from the femur; and inserting the pin of the replacement
device into the hole of the femur to install the replacement device on
the desired location of the femur.
[0017] Alternatively, a method of forming a customized replacement device
for a femur will include the steps of duplicating the surface of the
distal anterior femur from an individual; and using the duplicate to form
a back surface of the customized replacement device and/or a customized
marking template.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0018] FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a femur showing the patellar side
with its trochlear model groove, and the replacement device adapted to
couple to the femur;
[0019] FIG. 2 is a perspective view of an embodiment of the present
invention illustrating an exemplary replacement device coupled to the
distal end of a femur;
[0020] FIG. 3 is an another perspective view of the femur with the
replacement device coupled to the femur;
[0021] FIG. 4 is yet another perspective view of the femur associating
with a custom marking template having guide holes that correspond to the
pin on a replacement device, residing on the trochlear groove surface of
the femur;
[0022] FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of the replacement device residing
on the femur, along the line 5-5 in FIG. 2;
[0023] FIG. 6 is the perspective view of FIG. 4 with a patella residing on
the trochlear groove surface of the replacement device;
[0024] FIG. 7 is an exemplary illustration of a human femur attached to a
tibia by the anterior and the posterior cruciate ligaments;
[0025] FIG. 8 is an expanded view of a human knee joint in a bent
position;
[0026] FIG. 9 is a perspective view showing a patellar face side of a
human femur and a back side view of a replacement device prior to
placement of the replacement device onto the femur;
[0027] FIG. 10 is a diagrammatic chart of a method of making a mold for
constructing a replacement device; and
[0028] FIG. 11 is a diagrammatic chart of a method of making a replacement
device and a marking template from a femoral mold.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0029] This description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, but is
made merely for the purpose of illustrating the general principles of the
invention. The section titles and overall organization of the present
detailed description are for the purpose of convenience only and are not
intended to limit the present invention.
[0030] One of the features of the present invention is to provide a
replacement device for a patient's knee joint that replicates as closely
as possible the original kinematics of the patient's knee. More
particularly, the replacement device substantially replicates patient's
actual trochlear tracking pattern of the femur to maintain the original
articulating movement of the knee. To do so, unhealthy articular
cartilage is removed and replaced with the replacement device, which is
custom fitted for a patient's femur to maintain as closely as possible
the original articulating movement of the patella about the trochlear
groove. That is, the replacement device is custom fitted so that the
underside of the patella articulates about the femur approximately two
(2) to six (6) mm away, which mimics what a patella on a healthy
articular cartilage would articulate from. The above feature may be
accomplished by providing a trochlear groove that is formed along the
replacement device that tracts the trochlear groove on the femur.
Moreover, as further discussed below, the underside of the replacement
device substantially matches the face of the femur, to minimize any error
in positioning the replacement device about the femur. With this
introductory in mind, more detailed description of the invention is
discussed below.
[0031] As illustrated by way of example in FIGS. 2 and 9, one embodiment
of the present invention includes a custom replacement device 4 adapted
to associate with the distal end of a patient's femur 2. FIG. 2 shows a
model made of the patient's femur in FIG. 9. The model 200 is
substantially similar to the patient's femur 2 and is used to make the
custom replacement device 4 (as discussed below). The surface near the
distal end of the femur 2 defines a patellar face 5, and along the
patellar face is a trochlear groove 3 of the femur. FIGS. 7 and 8 show
exemplary views of a normal, intact knee joint. Referring to FIG. 8, on a
healthy knee, the trochlear groove would be covered with about 5 mm of
articular cartilage 100. However, if the articular cartilage wears down
for any reason, the cushion and sliding surface that the cartilage
provides is lost, resulting in pain, and therefore may need to be
replaced with the custom replacement device 4.
[0032] One of the advantages with the replacement device 4 is that it is
custom fitted for a patient's femur so that the replacement device 4
replacing the articular cartilage will maintain as closely as possible
the original kinematics of the patient's knee. That is, the replacement
device 4 is customized specifically to fit the patellar face 5 surface
and trochlear groove 3 region of the femur 2. In this regard, as
illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 9, the back surface 6 of the replacement
device 4 substantially matches the surface area of the patellar face 5 of
the femur 2. Moreover, the back (bottom) surface 6 also matches and fits
to the contours of the trochlear groove region 3 of the patellar surface
5. The custom replacement device is coupled to the femur through one or
more hole(s) 202 in the distal end of a human femur. The hole(s) 202 can
be made by a surgeon and may be located so as to reside along the
trochlear groove region 3 of the human femur 2. As shown in FIG. 5, the
replacement device can be implanted into the femur via a pin 19 inserted
into the one or more corresponding hole 202, thus resurfacing the
patellar face surface of the human femur. The front (top) surface 7 of
the replacement device is contoured to maintain the tracking of the
patella centrally within the front surface during articulation of the
patella about the trochlear groove (FIG. 2).
[0033] As illustrated by way of example in FIGS. 1 and 2, the replacement
device 4 may be substantially defined by four boundary conditions 8, 10,
12, 14, along with the back surface 6 and the front surface 7. By way of
background, a human knee joint includes two cruciate ligaments which are
located in the center of the knee joint. As shown in FIG. 8, these two
ligaments, referred to in the art as the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)
22 and the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) 24, are the primary
stabilizing ligaments of the knee. The ACL 22 attaches, at its bottom 26,
to the tibia 30, and, passes obliquely upward to insert 20 into the inner
and back part 32 of the outer condyle 15 of the femur 2. Attachment of
the ACL to the femur stabilizes the knee joint along the rotational axis
and prevents the femur from sliding backwards on the tibia (or the tibia
from sliding forward on the femur).
[0034] In one embodiment of the present invention, the distal portion of
the patellar tongue or first boundary condition of the replacement device
may be designed to not extend far back to impinge upon the tibial surface
or cartilage of the tibia. Therefore, the first boundary condition of a
replacement device may be defined to be approximately 3 to 5 mm from the
point of attachment of the ACL to the patient's femur. Specifically, as
illustrated in FIGS. 3 and 8, the first boundary condition 8 may be
approximately 3 to 5 mm from the point of attachment 20 of the anterior
cruciate ligament 22 to the femur 2. In other words, there is
approximately 3 to 5 mm distance between the patellar tongue region
(first boundary condition) 8 and the attachment 20 of the anterior
cruciate ligament 22. Alternatively, the first boundary condition of a
replacement device 8 is of a sufficient distance above the groove 21
where the ACL exits so as not to result in impingement upon the tibial
surface 33 during functioning.
[0035] Referring to FIGS. 1 and 8, the second boundary condition 10 may be
defined approximately at or near the superior edge 100 of the end of the
natural cartilage 102. As shown in FIGS. 3 and 8, the third boundary
condition 12 may be approximately at the top ridge of the right condyle
104. The fourth boundary condition 14 may be approximately at the top
ridge of the left condyle 106. The four boundary conditions 8, 10, 12, 14
and front 6 and back 7 surface, as described above, may substantially
define the perimeter or outer edges of the replacement device in
approximately an oval shape. However, the replacement device need not be
defined by any one of the four boundary conditions. Alternatively, the
replacement device may be defined by any one of or any combination of the
four boundary conditions. Of course, the perimeter or outer edges of
individual replacement devices may differ depending on the unique
anatomic characteristics of an individual patient's femur. Besides the
four boundary conditions, the back surface 6 is customized to match the
patellar face 5 of the femur 2 (FIG. 1). Moreover, edges of the
replacement device may be streamlined to have smooth or rounded edges so
that the replacement device may come in direct contact with the bony
surface of the femur without etching away at the femur. Still further,
the streamlined edges prevents tearing or damaging the soft tissue around
the knee.
[0036] As further illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3, the front surface 7 is
generally concave, which is formed by the inner and outer lateral (side)
lip regions being raised to contour around the third and fourth boundary
conditions 12 and 14, respectively. Accordingly, as illustrated by way of
example in FIG. 3, the longitudinal path of the resulting front surface
substantially replicates the actual trochlear groove-tracking pattern for
a healthy knee generally in two ways. The first way is to create a mold
that substantially replicates the distal end of a patient's femur (as
discussed below); and based on the geometry of the replicated mold, the
patient's trochlear groove tracking pattern can be determined off of the
mold. As illustrated by way of example in FIG. 3, the second way is to
align the tracking pattern (axis t-t) along the front surface area 7 so
that it is approximately perpendicular to the ends of the condyles 104 &
106 of the femur 2, i.e., and aligned with the center of the femoral head
(axis f-f); as most patients have a tracking pattern that is generally
perpendicular to the ends of the condyles. Thus, the first method can be
used to check the alignment of tracking pattern calculated by the second
method, and vice versa. Alternatively, the tracking pattern produced by
both methods can be combined to produce an average tracking pattern of
both methods. Either way, the tracking pattern produced by both methods
will substantially replicate the correct trochlear groove-tracking
pattern. Without such customization of the replacement device, there are
too many variations amongst patients' knees such that the original
kinematics for a patient could not be reproduced. In addition, standard
devices require the removal of large amounts of bone in order to make
them fit onto the femur. Still further, other known or new methods of
tracking the patient's trochlear groove of the femur may be used.
[0037] As illustrated by way of example in FIG. 6, the tracking pattern is
generally formed along the base of concave surface 313 of the replacement
device 4, thereby maintaining the patella 30 centrally within the device
312. Therefore, regardless of the direction or angle of movement of the
patella and tibia (shin bone) along the replacement device, the
trajectory of the patella will be maintained centrally within the
intercondyle space and the patella will glide smoothly within the central
line due to the increased curvature of the device along its lateral and
medial or side lip regions. This allows the present invention to use a
standard dome patellar prosthesis 30 such as the Kinamed, Inc. GEM Knee
System patella, which has a large contact area 34 with the device, to
distribute the stress applied to the patella and the device. So that even
if there is a slight misalignment with replicating the trochlear groove
of the femur, if at all, there is room for error and still full contact
across the surface of the patella to distribute the load in an optimal
manner. Accordingly, the patella will repeatedly glide over the front
surface of the replacement device, reliably, and there is little chance,
if at all, that the patella will dislocate from the tracking surface of
the replacement device. In addition, the large contact area distributes
the load and minimizes peak contact stress in the polyethylene thus
reducing wear debris generation.
[0038] In the past, replacement of a diseased knee joint required surgical
modification of the surface of the femur so as to allow a close "fit" of
the prosthetic device within the new joint. This required extensive
removal or carving of the cartilage and bone surfaces of the head of the
femur in order to "match" with the back surface of a standardized
prosthetic device. With the present invention, there is almost no removal
of original bone and therefore, no loss of requisite anatomical
structures. Insertion of the replacement device requires minimal removal
of existing anatomic structures, if at all. Therefore, the intent is to
remove only the diseased portion (the natural cartilage) of the patient's
knee joint prior to installing the replacement device.
[0039] In a healthy knee joint, the average thickness of the articular
cartilage 102 at the knee joint is about 4 to 5 min (FIG. 8). In other
words, there is about 4 to 5 mm of articular cartilage covering the
femur, so that the patella articulates about 4 to 5 mm from the trochlear
grove of the femur. In the case of unhealthy cartilage, where the
replacement device is needed, the unhealthy cartilage is removed and
replaced with the replacement device, which has been custom made for the
patient's femur. To replicate as closely as possible the original
kinematics of the patient's patello-femoral joint, as illustrated by way
of example in FIG. 2 (and further detailed in FIG. 5), the thickness
between the back 6 and front 7 surface areas of the replacement device
may vary approximately between 2 mm and 6 mm. In other words, the
thickness of the custom replacement device may be approximately that of
the patient's original articular cartilage. To further enhance the
interaction between the custom replacement device 4 and the femur 2, a
pin 19 may be located at a predetermined position along the back surface
6 of the replacement device. One or more pin(s) 19 can protrude from the
back surface area to enhance the association of the replacement device
with the femur. As illustrated in FIG. 9, the replacement device may have
three pins that insert into the corresponding holes in the femur, so that
there will be very little play, if any, once the pins are inserted into
the holes. Alternatively, other apparatus and methods may be used to
couple the replacement device to the femur, for example, a bone ingrowth
surface or adhesives, including cement, may be applied between the
replacement device and the femur. Still another alternative may be a
screw or bolt, where the screw penetrates through the opening in the
replacement device and into the femur. In other words, any known or new
apparatus or methods may be used to couple the replacement device to the
femur.
[0040] By way of background, a bone ingrowth surface is a surface
treatment applied to an implant which is designed to allow the patient's
bone to attach or ingrow into the prosthesis, and thereby securing the
prosthesis to the bone. The surface coating can assume a number of
different forms. For example, commonly used is a process where a layer is
physically attached to the prosthesis through titanium plasma spraying.
Other techniques involve sintering small beads or mesh to the surface or
applying a layer of hydroxyapatite may also be used.
[0041] With regard to surgically implanting the replacement device, as
illustrated in FIG. 4, a customized marking template 300 may be provided
that is substantially defined by first (back or bottom) and second (front
or top) surface areas 302 and 304, respectively. Like the back surface 6
of the replacement device 4, the first surface area 302 of the marking
template 300 is customized to match the surface area of the trochlear
groove 5 of the femur so that the marking template will be positioned
properly with the femur. The second surface area 304 includes a hole 306
or holes (depending upon the number of pins protruding from the
replacement device) that is in a predetermined position to align
substantially to the pin on the customized replacement device.
Furthermore, the holes or slots 306 of the second surface area 304 of the
custom marking template, extend through to the first surface 302 of the
custom marking template. Therefore, each hole or holes 306 in the
predetermined positions of the marking template serve as guides for
formation of openings 202 in the femur 2 of the patient into which the
pin(s) 19 will be inserted. Moreover, the custom marking template 300 may
be substantially defined by four boundary conditions as in the
replacement device 4. Accordingly, the custom marking template 300 as
shown in FIG. 4, assists the surgeon in identifying the perimeter of the
custom replacement device 4 as well as the location of opening 202
(depending upon the number of pins protruding from the back surface area
6 of the custom replacement device 4) that will be drilled into the
patellar face surface of the femur 2.
[0042] To surgically implant the replacement device to the patellar face 5
of the femur 2, a surgeon may first need to remove some or all remaining
diseased or damaged articular cartilage 102 on the patellar surface 5 of
the femur (FIG. 8). The surgeon may then scrape away the articulate
cartilage until a substantial bony surface 37 of the patellar face shows.
FIG. 8 shows a view of a patient's femur prior to preparation by the
surgeon for insertion of a replacement device. Thereafter, the marking
template 300 is aligned and positioned onto the patellar face to drill
the necessary openings for the pins (FIG. 4). Since the first surface
area 302 of the marking template matches the contours of the patellar
face 5 along with the four the boundary condition 8, 10, 12 and 14, the
surgeon is assured that the marking template is aligned and positioned
properly. In other words, the custom marking template can be used to
guide the surgeon in marking the location of the openings and thereby aid
in the formation of the openings at their appropriate location or
predetermined positions. Once the marking template is in position, the
surgeon can precisely drill the openings, aided by the holes or slots on
the marking template, using any drilling method known to one of ordinary
skill in the art. FIG. 9 shows a representative femur 2 where the
diseased natural cartilage has been removed, thus exposing the bony
surface of the patellar face 5 of the femur and the openings 202 into
which the pin(s) 19 of the replacement device 4 will insert.
[0043] With the necessary openings 202 precisely drilled into the patellar
face 5 of the femur, the marking template is removed and replaced with
the replacement device 4. As illustrated in FIG. 9, the custom
replacement device is placed onto the femur by insertion of the pin 19 or
pins protruding from the back surface of the custom replacement device,
into the corresponding openings in the predetermined location formed in
the patellar face surface of the femur. The custom replacement device can
be affixed to the bone 20 by a surgical cement, such as Howmedica Simplex
P Cement, or any other method known to one ordinarily skilled in the art.
Once in place, the replacement device provides the patient substantially
full motion originally provided by the native anatomical knee joint. In
other words, in most, if not all, positions of the leg, and throughout
the normal range of movement of the leg, the custom replacement device
permits normal rotation and lateral movement substantially similar to the
original kinematics of the healthy knee joint. Therefore, the replacement
device 4 gives the patient the "most natural" replacement of the knee
possible. Note that with the present invention, there is no need to carve
away at the femur, since the backside of the replacement device matches
the surface of the femur.
[0044] FIGS. 10-11, illustrate by way of example an exemplary method of
producing the replacement device 4 and the marking template. Initially, a
three-dimensional model of the distal end of the femur is formed. This
may be accomplished in step 62, where the distal end of the femur is CT
scanned to form a number of slices that are predetermined distances apart
along the longitudinal axis of the femur, such that when the slices are
assembled they form a three-dimensional contour of the femur.
Furthermore, to ensure that the slices are aligned properly when they are
assembled, a reference point, such as X and Y coordinate may be marked on
each of the slices as a reference point. For example, the scanning may be
done through a X-ray or CT scan protocol that defines a number of slices
to be taken, and the starting and stopping marks to determine where to
start and stop scanning. Moreover, in critical areas as in the trochlear
groove of the femur where accuracy is particularly important, the
distance between the slices may be reduced to more accurately define the
contour of the femur in that area. In this regard, the slices may
generally be about 3 mm apart, but for more accuracy the slices may be
about 1.5 mm apart. Of course, the distance between the slices may
further vary depending on the accuracy desired. In other words, in such
areas where more detail regarding contour is desired, like the four
boundary regions 8, 10, 12 and 14, and the trochlear groove 5 region, the
distance between the slices may be reduced to about 1.5 mm or less.
[0045] To further improve the accuracy of the sliced images of the femur,
an X-ray motion detection rod may also be used to detect movement by the
patient while the CT scan is taken. That is, while the CT scan is taken,
any movement by the patient can distort the accuracy of sliced images. To
correct for this distortion, a detection rod may be used to detect the
movement of the patient, by moving with the patient, so that when the
sliced images are later analyzed, the movement by the patient can be
detected and the sliced images can be adjusted for the movement. Still
further, a scaling rod may also be used to ensure that the sliced images
are at a proper scale so that when the sliced images are assembled, the
size of the femur model is correct.
[0046] As illustrated in step 64, once the sliced images are taken of the
femur, each sliced image is transferred onto a film, and reviewed for a
number of features, such as clarity, scaling, and whether the images were
taken according to the protocol. If the images were properly taken, then
in step 66, each of the film is cut around the perimeter of the sliced
image of the femur. Each cut film may also be marked so that relative
position of each of the cut film can later be determined In step 68, from
all of the cut films, a respective small plate may be made from each of
the cut films having the image of the cut film and the marked
information: In step 70, these plates are then used to digitize the image
into a computer.
[0047] In step 72, with digitized information of each individual slices,
and the spacing between the sliced images, a computer aided design (CAD)
system with a macro may be used to lay all of the sliced images on to a
planar format. In the planar format, knowing the relative position of
each sliced images relative to one an another, reference holes are drawn
to each of the images, so that when the slices are assembled about the
reference holes, an accurate model of the femur may be reproduced. The
digitized sliced images are assembled about the reference holes to view
the computer generated image of the femur.
[0048] In step 78, to replicate a femur from the digitized information, a
Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAM) file may be used to cut plastic plates
of the digitized information. For example, a laser or any other method
known to one of ordinary skill in the art may be used to cut the plastic
plates representing the perimeter of the sliced images of the femur,
along with the reference holes. Accordingly, individual plastic plates
representing a respective sliced image of the femur is produced. In step
80, these plates may be checked for accuracy and quality against the
films produced earlier. Of course, if the cut plate does not correspond
with the respective film then another plate may be cut to match the image
and scale of the film.
[0049] In step 82, with the accurate plates, they are assembled in their
respective positions and spaced apart according to the distance in which
the sliced images were taken. That is, plates are orderly inserted into a
rod through the reference holes so that the plates align properly.
Furthermore, as stated above, in areas where accuracy is important, the
slices may be about 1.5 mm apart, while other slices may be about 3 mm
apart. The distance between the plates is maintained by a spacer between
the plates, where the thickness of the spacer will also vary depending
upon the desired accuracy. The thickness of the plates, themselves, may
also vary depending on the desired accuracy. In other words, in the
trochlear groove area the plates themselves may be thinner and spaced
closer together to other plates. With regard to the spacers, they may be
formed from the reference hole pieces cut from the plates.
[0050] In step 84, with the plates assembled, using the edges of the
plates as the outer boundary, the spaces between the plates and the
incremental differences in the outer boundary of the plates are covered
with filler, such as clay, to form an outer surface of the femur (also
shown in FIG. 1). In other words, just enough filler is used to cover the
edges of the plates to smooth out the edges between the plates to define
the outer face of the femur. This forms a model of the distal end of the
femur. Although one method of forming a model is discussed here, other
known or new methods of forming a model of the femur may also be used.
For example, the CT image data may be compiled in a computer, a surface
created, and the model machined directly using the surface data to drive
a computer assisted machining system.
[0051] In step 86, from the model, a mold is made. This can be done for
example by placing the model into a standardized box and pouring liquid
rubber into it to make a mold. Referring to FIG. 11, in step 92, with the
mold, a second model of the femur may be made by pouring, such liquid as
urethane into the mold. This step may be repeated to make three models of
the femur. Two of the models may be sent to the physician to review and
check for accuracy and affirm the exact location of the boundary points.
[0052] In step 94, with the second model of the femur, the boundaries are
marked where the replacement device is to be placed on the femur. Then
the edges of the second model are squared off such that it is outside the
marked boundaries where the replacement device is to be located.
Additionally, the four boundary conditions that may substantially define
the replacement device, along with the outer perimeter of the device may
be marked using transfer ink on the second model. Thereafter, in step 96,
a third mold may be made using machinable material such as plastic glass,
from the squared off second model so that the underside of the third mold
contours the trochlear groove of the femur and marked with the transfer
ink indicating the perimeter of the replacement device. In step 97, on
the underside of this third mold is marked for pegs.
[0053] The third mold is then machined or sanded along the top surface to
generally give it a uniform surface throughout. For example, the top
surface of the third mold may be sanded until a uniform thickness of 5 mm
is relatively formed or to a desired thickness between the top and bottom
surfaces of the replacement device. Additionally, the edges of the third
mold are also machined to give it desired finish. Accordingly, a mold for
the replacement device may be made of plastic glass, for example,
generally having an oval shaped defined by the four boundary conditions
and the concave upper surface. To improve the accuracy of the mold, the
third mold may be made slightly larger than the actual size of the
replacement device, as cast mold has tendency to shrink. As an example,
the mold may be made about 2% larger than the actual size of the
replacement
[0054] In step 101, to form a pin that protrudes from the underside of the
replacement device, a hole for each of the pin is drilled through the
third mold, and inserted with a peg representing the pin. As an example,
underside of the replacement device may have three pins placed in
equilateral triangle format to distribute the load evenly. Furthermore,
the pins may be distributed in predetermined distance apart to
standardize the drill pattern for all of the replacement device.
Additionally, the equilateral triangular pins may have its center point
about halfway between the right and left condyle extents, where the pins
generally protrude perpendicularly from the underside of the replacement
device.
[0055] In step 103, the metal replacement device and the marking template
are made from the third mold having the pegs protruding from it. In step
105, to produce a replacement device, a fourth female mold is made from
the third mold, using such material as rubber. From the female mold,
liquid metal can be poured into it, to produce a metal replacement
device. In step 107, to produce a marking template, the pegs on the third
mold is removed and a fifth female mold is made, using such material as
rubber. Then from the fifth female mold without the pegs, liquid metal is
poured into it, to produce the marking template. Alternatively, any other
method known to one of ordinarily skilled in the art of producing the
replacement device and the marking template from the third mold is within
the scope of the present invention. It is also possible to machine the
replacement device directly by creating a computer model of the device
and using said model to drive a machine tool to cut the model directly
from a piece of material.
[0056] With regard to material, the replacement device 4 is made of a
substantially firm, non-bioreactive material. Examples of such material
include, surgical grade Co Cr alloy or other substantially rigid,
bio-compatible material such as titanium, stainless steel, zirconia, or
alumina ceramic. All surfaces of the device, which are external to the
femoral bone (once the device is implanted), are highly polished and
smoothed.
[0057] In closing, it is noted that specific illustrative embodiments of
the invention have been disclosed hereinabove. Accordingly, the invention
is not limited to the precise embodiments described in detail
hereinabove. With respect to the claims, it is applicant's intention that
the claims not be interpreted in accordance with the sixth paragraph of
35 U.S.C. .sctn. 112 unless the term "means" is used followed by a
functional statement.
* * * * *