| United States Patent Application |
20100291314
|
| Kind Code
|
A1
|
|
Kashani-Shirazi; Kaveh
|
November 18, 2010
|
SELF-HARDENING MATERIAL AND PROCESS FOR LAYERWISE FORMATION OF MODELS
Abstract
The invention relates to a self-hardening material for layerwise
construction of three-dimensional components, whereby the material
comprises at least one particulate material and a separately applied
bonding agent for bonding the particulate material, and has a setting
time which is at least several times as long as the application time of a
particulate layer.
| Inventors: |
Kashani-Shirazi; Kaveh; (Munchen, DE)
|
| Correspondence Address:
|
DOBRUSIN & THENNISCH PC
29 W LAWRENCE ST, SUITE 210
PONTIAC
MI
48342
US
|
| Assignee: |
Voxeljet Technology
|
| Family ID:
|
38954913
|
| Appl. No.:
|
12/377137
|
| Filed:
|
August 6, 2007 |
| PCT Filed:
|
August 6, 2007 |
| PCT NO:
|
PCT/DE07/01372 |
| 371 Date:
|
June 18, 2010 |
| Current U.S. Class: |
427/521 ; 427/385.5; 427/386; 427/487; 523/400; 524/502; 524/507; 525/119; 525/131; 525/329.7 |
| Current CPC Class: |
B29C 67/0081 20130101; B29K 2033/12 20130101; B33Y 70/00 20141201; B29C 67/0077 20130101; B33Y 10/00 20141201; B29K 2105/16 20130101 |
| Class at Publication: |
427/521 ; 525/119; 427/487; 427/385.5; 525/131; 525/329.7; 427/386; 524/507; 524/502; 523/400 |
| International Class: |
C08F 2/48 20060101 C08F002/48; C08L 63/00 20060101 C08L063/00; C08F 2/46 20060101 C08F002/46; B05D 3/10 20060101 B05D003/10; C08L 75/04 20060101 C08L075/04 |
Foreign Application Data
| Date | Code | Application Number |
| Aug 20, 2006 | DE | 10 2006 038 858.5 |
Claims
1-17. (canceled)
18. A self-hardening material for layerwise construction of
three-dimensional components, whereby the material comprises at least one
particulate material and a separately applied bonding agent for bonding
the particulate material, and where a setting time is at least several
times as long as a application time of a particulate layer.
19. The self-hardening material as per claim 18, whereby the setting time
is greater than 20 times as long as the application time of the
particulate layer.
20. The self-hardening material as per claim 18, in which setting of the
binding material takes place after formation of the component.
21. The self-hardening material as per claim 18, whereby the component
demonstrates uncured setting within 72 hours.
22. The self-hardening material as per claim 18, whereby the binder
contains at least one component of the group including acrylate,
methacrylate and/or sterols.
23. The self-hardening material as per claim 18, whereby the particulate
material used is polymethylmethacrylate.
24. The self-hardening material as per claim 18, whereby the binding
material can be polymerised using UV light, radiation, heat and/or
reactive activators.
25. The self-hardening material as per claim 18, whereby the binder is
composed of a multi-component bonding system.
26. The self-hardening material as per claim 18, whereby the binding
material used is polyurethane resin or epoxy resin.
27. The self-hardening material as per claim 18, whereby the binder
releases at least part of the particulate material.
28. The self-hardening material as per claim 18, whereby the binder
contains further ingredients for the improvement of printability, such
as, for example, an increase or decrease in viscosity and/or surface
tension.
29. The self-hardening material as per claim 18, the particulate material
used is a filler material.
30. A process for layerwise construction of three-dimensional components,
whereby a material comprises at least one particulate material and a
bonding agent for self-hardening of a particulate material, with a
setting time which is at least several times as long as a application
time of a particulate layer.
31. The process according to claim 30, whereby the setting time is
between 20 and 150 times as long as the application time for the
particulate layer.
32. The process according to claim 30, whereby the component demonstrates
uncured setting within 72 hours.
33. The process according to claim 30, whereby the setting time is
controlled by process temperature.
34. The process according to claim 30, whereby polymerisation of the
binder using UV light, radiation, heat and/or reactive activators is
employed.
Description
CLAIM OF PRIORITY
[0001] The present application claims priority from German Application No.
DE 102006038858.5, filed on Aug. 20, 2006 and is the National Phase of
PCT Application PCT/DE2007/001372, filed on Aug. 6, 2007, disclosure of
which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] This invention relates to a self-hardening material and a process
for layered formation of three-dimensional components.
BACKGROUND
[0003] The process for the formation of three-dimensional components has
been known for a long time.
[0004] For example, European Patent EP 0 431 924 B1 describes a process
for the manufacture of three-dimensional objects from computer data. It
describes a particulate material that can be deposited in a thin layer on
a platform and selectively printed with a binder using a print head. The
printed area is bonded and sets under the influence of the binder. The
platform is lowered by the thickness of one layer and a new layer of
particulate material is spread and is also bonded. These steps are
repeated until a given height is achieved. A three-dimensional object is
created from the printed and bonded areas. The object, which is embedded
in loose particulate material, is released from the platform, then
removed from the loose particulate material.
[0005] It is observed that objects formed by this process have been shown
to have poor dimensional stability due to uneven hardening and therefore
the tolerances in the formed components are relatively high.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0006] Accordingly, pursuant to a first aspect of the present invention,
there is contemplated a self-hardening material for layerwise
construction of three-dimensional components, whereby the material
com-prises at least one particulate material and a separately applied
bonding agent for bonding the particulate material, and where the setting
time is at least several times as long as the application time of a
particulate layer.
[0007] The invention of the first aspect may be further characterized by
one or any combination of the features described herein, such as the
setting time is greater than 20 times as long as the application time of
the particulate layer; setting of the binding material takes place after
formation of the component; the component demonstrates uncured setting
within 72 hours; the binder contains at least one component of the group
including acrylate, methacrylate and/or sterols; the particulate material
used is polymethylmethacrylate; the binding material can be polymerised
using UV light, radiation, heat and/or reactive activators; the binder is
composed of a multi-component bonding system; the binding material used
is polyurethane resin or epoxy resin; the binder releases at least part
of the particulate material; the binder contains further ingredients for
the improvement of printability, such as, for example, an increase or
decrease in viscosity and/or surface tension; the particulate material
used is a filler material.
[0008] Accordingly, pursuant to a second aspect of the present invention,
there is contemplated a process for layerwise construction of
three-dimensional components, whereby the material comprises at least one
particulate material and a bonding agent for self-hardening of the
particulate material, with a setting time which is at least several times
as long as the application time of a particulate layer.
[0009] The invention of the second aspect may be further characterized by
one or any combination of the features described herein, such as the
setting time is between 20 and 150 times as long as the application time
for the particulate layer; the component demonstrates uncured setting
within 72 hours; the setting time is controlled by process temperature;
the polymerisation of the binder using UV light, radiation, heat and/or
reactive activators is employed.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0010] Examples of the preferred embodiment of the invention are described
in relation to the following drawings which are explained in detail.
[0011] The drawings show:
[0012] FIG. 1a-h, illustrate a side view of the order of process of the
invention according to the preferred embodiment;
[0013] FIG. 2a-h, illustrate the effect of different hardening speeds on
deformation;
[0014] FIG. 3a-b, illustrate the drying of the component in a powder bed.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0015] In contrast to the invention described above is a self-hardening
material for layered formation of three-dimensional components, whereby
the material comprises at least one particulate material and a separate
binding material for bonding the particulate material, and a setting
duration which is at least several times as long as the application time
of the particulate layer.
[0016] With such a material it is then possible that the first formed
underlying layer is only bonded and hardened after a specific period of
time. Subsequent layers do not harden until after this period has
elapsed. Due to the similar time of hardening, no stress occurs in the
printed area, and therefore there is no significant warping or
deformation.
[0017] A self-hardening system in the sense of this invention is intended
to mean a bonding system which, without outside influence (in the form of
temperature, energy input, etc.) that can harden within 72 hours. The
time required is referred to as setting time.
[0018] This is not intended to mean complete hardening. A green cure is
sufficient in which the form of the component is stable, but cannot bear
loads. This means that the components should be able to support their own
weight. A large part (>50%) of the shrinkage which takes place during
hardening occurs during this time.
[0019] Achieving delayed hardening in the sense of the invention involves
allowing less than 5% of setting, and hence shrinkage, to occur within a
layer before the next layer is deposited.
[0020] A further advantage of the invention shown here is a process for
the layered formation of three-dimensional components, whereby the
material comprises at least one particulate material and a separate
binding material for bonding the particulate material, and a setting
duration which is at least several times as long as the application time
of the particulate layer.
[0021] As a result of setting time, commencement of setting, and delaying
shrinkage, hardening of the entire piece can be made effectively
simultaneous (relative to the overall time frame). As a consequence the
component shrinks overall by the same amount and at the same time, so
that no stress is developed. Any stresses developed by the small amount
of shrinkage during the formation phase are relieved in the soft
components which have yet to harden.
[0022] The uniform shrinkage can, as with casting models, be accounted for
using a scaling factor during the CAD model scaling process. If the
component decreases during hardening by a factor of X, the model can be
made larger by the same factor X. Process related shrinkage will then
result in a model of the correct size.
[0023] The speed of reaction (i.e. setting) depends on the time taken to
deposit a layer and dope it, and on the height of a layer. It is usually
not necessary to delay hardening until the entire model is formed. As a
rule, a delay in hardening for the time it takes to build up at least 20
layers is sufficient.
[0024] A particular advantage has been demonstrated if the component sets
within at least 48 hours.
[0025] The optimal value for the delay necessary for a certain component
and material can be determined by a person skilled in the art using a
simple trial (making and testing a sample part).
[0026] Often, a hardening delay of 150 particulate layers is sufficient.
[0027] In the preferred embodiment, however, and depending on the
component and material used, it can also be advantageous if the setting
(i.e. solidification) only occurs after formation of the entire
component.
[0028] Setting delay can be effected, for example, by lowering the
temperature during formation.
[0029] According to a further embodiment of the present invention, it can
also be a benefit if reaction inhibitors are added to the bonding agent
and/or particulate material.
[0030] Further, a slow acting binder can be used.
[0031] With materials and processes disclosed by this invention it is now
possible to use materials which up to now have been deemed inappropriate
due to their tendency to shrink.
[0032] Within the meaning of this invention, bonding agents and/or binders
include all substances that can bind the particulate material and can
form a coherent structure. Various materials and reaction mechanisms are
appropriate for this. Binders and particulate materials especially must
be part of a suitable system.
[0033] Examples of appropriate materials and reaction mechanisms include
the following: [0034] Monomeric binder systems based on acrylates,
methacrylates, styrols, cross-linked or not cross-linked, polymerisation
triggered by UV light, radiation, heat, reactive activators. [0035]
Multiple component glue systems such as polyurethane resins or epoxy
resins for which cross-linking occurs through the reaction of two
components. [0036] Substances which dissolve all or part of the
particulate materials and bond them in this way.
[0037] The binding material can also contain different solvents and/or
monomers, chemicals that cause cross-linking and/or reaction assisting
chemicals such as delayers, catalysts and fillers (e.g. nanoparticles).
In order to improve the print characteristics, the binder liquid can
contain yet further additives e.g. for changing viscosity.
[0038] In an especially preferred embodiment of the invention, the
particulate material contains fillers in order to minimize shrinkage of
the component or to improve the material's characteristics
[0039] Furthermore, additives such as initiators, catalysts and delayers
can be added to the particulate material which, for example, may be
required for the bonding reaction.
[0040] In an especially preferred embodiment of the process, the bonding
of the grains of the particulate material can be achieved by solvents.
[0041] A particular advantage of this in the preferred embodiment is the
use of a highly soluble plastic such as, for example,
polyethylmethacrylate as the particulate material.
[0042] The binding material can contain solvents, such as alcohols,
ketones or acetates. It can also be a mixture of different solvents.
[0043] Because the binding material contains a solvent, there is no need
for preparing and dosing the binder, in order, for example, to prevent
the plugging of print heads.
[0044] The bonding function of the solvent according to this preferred
embodiment is based on the grains of the particulate material being
dissolved in the printed areas and bonded together. When the solvent
escapes, the contact surfaces of the grains are bonded and a solid region
is established. In some cases, a reduction in material can be seen.
[0045] Because setting and shrinkage are linked to the degree of thinning
out of the solvent, even setting within the component can be achieved by
slowing down the evaporation rate, thereby reducing deformation.
[0046] In a preferred embodiment of the process, this can be achieved
through control of, and especially reduction of the process temperature.
[0047] In a further preferred embodiment of the process, one can delay the
volatilisation of alcohol through the addition of a moisture-containing
material such as monoethylene glycol.
[0048] A particularly beneficial solution can be achieved by varying the
solvents used. The higher alcohols (n-butanol, pentanol, hexanol, etc.),
which have higher boiling points and lower steam pressure, can provide a
simple and effective way to reduce evaporation.
[0049] With a process temperature of, for example, 20.degree. C. and the
use of a polyethylmethacrylate-containing particulate material, pentanol
can achieve very good results when used as a solvent. In a preferred
embodiment of the invention the solvent can be printed (i.e. applied)
using a drop-on-demand print head onto a previously applied particulate
layer. The amount of pentanol used corresponds for example to about 9% by
weight of the particulate material. Components so formed display no
measurable deformation. The bonding of the components is greater than by
other known processes. Because only a simple plastic powder and alcohol
are used as reagents, the material costs are also low.
[0050] The components can be cured either in a powder bed or individually,
according to readiness, at room temperature or at a specified
temperature.
[0051] If the components are taken out of the powder bed before curing,
care must be taken to ensure that uneven drying does not cause
deformation. A component can, for example, dry out in an uneven way if it
is lying on a non-porous surface. The underside remains moist longer
under these circumstances and can eventually lead to deformation during
curing of the component.
[0052] It can therefore be advantageous for deformation free components
because they can dry out evenly.
[0053] Furthermore, components which are still wet and delicate could be
damaged by being taken away or warp under their self weight.
[0054] In a preferred embodiment of the invention, drying takes place in
such a way that the component is left for a period of time in a loose
powder bed and is covered with powder until it is adequately dried. One
should take care that the powder bed is adequately permeable for the
solvent.
[0055] If the particulate material itself is able to transport the
solvent, the component can be dried as far as possible, or completely, in
the powder bed. This allows the solvent to diffuse in the powder bed from
grain to grain. It is important that the particulate material is soluble
in the solvent.
[0056] In the sense of this invention, however, the filling material can
also be chosen such that it, at least partially, takes up and/or passes
on the solvent.
[0057] In addition, the solvent can also be chosen such that it is
sufficiently taken up and/or passed on by the filling material.
[0058] By using solvent as a binding material to bond the particulate
material, only a limited strength of the components can be achieved,
because after evaporation of the solvent a porous structure remains.
[0059] In order to achieve even higher strength, according to the
preferred embodiment, one can advantageously employ additional material
in the form of a binder in the powder bed.
[0060] Almost all of the appropriate binders for the process demonstrate a
volume reduction on setting. For example, the setting reaction of
radical-polymerised binders breaks the double bonding of the monomers,
and forms a bond to the next monomer. The distance between the molecules
is reduced if they polymerise into such a macromolecule, which appears on
the macroscopic level as volume reduction. With polymerisation of the
monomer methylmethacrylate to polymethylmethacrylate, for example,
shrinkage of 21% is observed.
[0061] In a particularly beneficial embodiment of the process, a binder
based on various methacrylates and/or styrols is used which, for example,
can be selectively laid down using a piezoelectric print head onto a
powder layer.
[0062] In addition to a monomer the binding material can also be a
cross-linking agent (e.g. multifunctional methacrylate). A catalyst
(toluidine) and/or delayer (chinon) can also be used.
[0063] Further additives and reagents are forseeable. A person skilled in
the art can set the characteristics of the binding material, and thus of
the component, by modifying the binder makeup thus creating a targeted
material.
[0064] Furthermore, it is possible to add other chemicals to increase or
reduce viscosity, surface tension and/or other print characteristics that
change way the binder flows. In this way, the printability of the binder
can be improved.
[0065] In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the particulate
material can be a PMMA-based pearl polymer. Other materials such as ABS,
PC-ABS, PA, PBT and metals could also be employed.
[0066] In addition, the particulate filler material can be glass, metals
or carbon fibre.
[0067] Beneficially, the particulate material can have reaction initiator
properties (e.g. benzoyl peroxide). Such an initiator could either be
mixed with the particulate material or be dissolved in the grains of the
particulate material.
[0068] In the preferred embodiment described, when a printing fluid with
binder characteristics is printed onto a particulate material a chemical
reaction takes place between the initiator found in the powder (BPO) and
the catalyst (toluidine) found in the fluid. Radicals are formed which
trigger polymerisation of the monomers.
[0069] Tests have shown that with such a system components with high
strength can be made by a 3D printing process.
[0070] In order, however, to prevent deformation, the polymerisation
reaction is delayed by the process of the invention.
[0071] The delay can be caused in various ways. Thereby, several effects
can be used in order to control the reaction kinetics in such a way that
deformation-free components can be produced.
[0072] A range of especially beneficial possibilities is described below:
[0073] The amount and type of initiator (e.g. benzoyl peroxide)
determines the speed of polymerisation. Using four times the amount of an
initiator doubles the reaction speed. Different initiators have different
decay rates and different levels of effectiveness in starting the
polymerisation reaction. A typical amount of initiator is less than 5% of
the amount of monomer used, and 0.1 to 2% would be preferable, depending
on the monomer used. [0074] Through the addition of various amounts of
catalyst (e.g. toluidine), the reaction speed can be controlled. Larger
amounts of catalyst give fast polymerisation reactions. It is favourable
to add amounts up to 5%. Better yet are additions of between 0.1 and 1%,
depending on the monomer used. [0075] The initiator (e.g.
benzoylperoxide) can either be added with the particulate material or be
dissolved in the grains. The polymerisation reaction is delayed if the
initiator is included in the grain, because the grain must dissolve and
the initiator must flow out before a polymerisation reaction can start.
The solubility of the particulate material, the monomer's aggressiveness
and temperature determine the speed of dissolution. [0076] An appropriate
choice of monomers can be made by a person skilled in the art to control
reaction speed. Different monomers have different reaction speeds. In
addition, it is possible to achieve an accelerated reaction through the
use of a combination of different monomers in a binding system (e.g.
copolymerisation of sterol and methylmethacrylate) in comparison to a
one-component system. [0077] The temperature at which the polymerisation
occurs determines reaction speed. Higher temperatures increase the
movement of molecules. Therefore they can find their reaction partner
more quickly and polymerisation speed increases. [0078] A further
possibility to delay the reaction is through the use of a substance that
slows down the reaction. It is of particular benefit to use such
materials that can delay polymerisation reactions without dampening the
reactivity of the system. One such delayer is, for example, benzochinone.
Delayers, which generally slow down a reaction, lead to the result that
not all of the monomer will be converted. Unreacted monomer is not
favourable because it causes weakening of the component. This is not the
case with delayers of the first type.
[0079] The possibilities listed above present only a selection of the
choices. A person skilled in the art can tailor the reaction kinetics via
the above methods to the demands of the process.
[0080] When setting the reaction speed in the sense of this invention,
care must be taken that polymerisation takes place slowly enough that the
shrinkage which occurs does not result in deformation of the component.
In general this is achieved when the reaction time is greater than the
time that the 3D printer needs to form the component.
[0081] In an especially preferred embodiment of this invention, the
particulate material is set in a thickening material which quickly takes
up the liquid and increases its viscosity. This decreases the tendency of
liquid to soak into the powder bed and the geometry of the component is
rendered exactly.
[0082] Of special benefit is that the thickening is achieved by the
particulate material itself or its components. In a preferred embodiment
of the invention this is achieved by using a polymer dissolved in the
print fluid that raises its viscosity. In this way, even small amounts of
polymer powder are sufficient to thicken the fluid.
[0083] Further beneficial embodiments of this present invention are
submitted in the claims below as well as their descriptions.
[0084] In relation to FIG. 1, the following describes the order of
printing according to a preferred embodiment of the invented process
using layerwise construction of models made of particulate material and
binding material as a rapid prototyping process.
[0085] According to the preferred embodiment described, the particulate
material indicated is polyethylmethacrylate and the binding material is
1-pentanol.
[0086] In forming a component such as, for example, a casting model, a
base platform 4 that the model is to be built on is sized to the layer
thickness of the particulate material 5. Next, particulate material 5,
for example a very fine, polyethylmethacrylate-based, alcohol-soluble
plastic powder is applied using a layering tool 1 onto base platform 4 in
the desired layer thickness. Next, the binder, for example pentanol, is
selectively applied to the areas to be hardened. This can, for example,
be carried out by means of a drop-on-demand droplet generator 3 of the
ink jet printer type. This layering step is repeated until the finished
component, bedded in loose particulate material 5, is complete.
[0087] To start with, the layering tool 1 is in the home position, which
is shown in FIG. 1a.
[0088] As shown in FIG. 1b, the following describes the construction of a
model with base platform 4 which is lowered by more than one layer.
[0089] Next the layering tool 1, as shown in FIG. 1c, travels across
without depositing particulate material to the position opposite the
filling device 2, until it stands over the border of base platform 4.
[0090] Now the base platform 4 is raised to exactly the height for
layering, which can be seen in FIG. 1d. This means that base platform 4
is now exactly one layer thickness lower than the layer height.
[0091] Finally, the layering tool 1 is driven in a constant motion over
base platform 4. This delivers particulate material 5 in exactly the
right amount and coats base platform 4. This is shown in FIG. 1e.
[0092] The layering tool 1 moves back after the deposition run without
deviation at high speed to the home position and can as needed be filled
again with the filling device 2. This is shown in FIG. 1f.
[0093] The print head 3 now moves over base platform 4 and thereby doses
the binder selectively in the areas where hardening is desired. This is
shown in FIG. 1g.
[0094] Next, the print head 3 moves back to the home position and all
elements are back in the starting position. This is shown in FIG. 1h,
which corresponds to FIG. 1a.
[0095] The printing process for the binding material on particulate
material 1 can be done during or after layering.
[0096] The steps 1a to 1h are repeated until the component, bedded in
loose particulate material, is printed to the target height.
[0097] The component is left for a sufficient amount of time in the powder
bed until adequate hardness is achieved.
[0098] Afterwards, it can be taken out and cleaned of any remaining
powder.
[0099] The component can then be put through appropriate post-processes.
[0100] In relation to FIG. 2 one can see the deformation effect with
different setting speeds. Particulate material 5 and binder are applied
alternately in a layer 6. The printed area 7 contracts resulting in
shrinkage 8. In FIGS. 2a to 2e it is shown that over-rapid hardening and
the consequent shrinkage can lead to geometry deformation in completed
components. In the sense of this invention, this can be prevented using a
targeted delay of the setting time as shown in FIGS. 2f to 2h.
[0101] Next, a layer 6 of particulate material 5 is printed with binder in
area 7. This is shown in FIG. 2a.
[0102] The printed area 7 retracts 8 as a consequence of faster fixation.
This is shown in FIG. 2b.
[0103] A second layer 9 of particulate material is applied and printed 7.
This is shown in FIG. 2c.
[0104] This now also retracts in layer 9. Because both layers are combined
with one another, the force is transmitted to the underside of layer 6.
[0105] If layer 6 is set hard enough, the tension within the layers causes
curvature 10. This is shown in FIG. 2d.
[0106] The resulting component will display this curved deformation.
[0107] If the lower level is still soft, the tension is relieved through
plastic deformation 8. This is shown in FIG. 2e.
[0108] Because this error is accumulated over many layers, the resulting
component has sloping sides.
[0109] Model construction from layer 6 proceeds in the same way using
delayed binding systems. However between the layers there is no hardening
and therefore no shrinkage of the printed area 7. This is shown in FIGS.
2f and 2g.
[0110] The hardening and shrinkage 8 is delayed until after formation of
the model. Thereby all areas of the component shrink virtually at the
same time and by the same amount. There is no deformation. This is shown
in FIG. 2h.
[0111] In relation to FIG. 3 the following describes the process for
drying and setting of a solvent-based binder according to a preferred
embodiment of the process in this invention.
[0112] According to the preferred embodiment described, the particulate
material is polyethylmethacrylate and the binding material is 1-pentanol.
[0113] The component will, as described here, be constructed on a layered
basis and, according to the preferred embodiment, the completed
component, bedded in loose particulate material 5, will be left in the
powder bed to dry.
[0114] In FIG. 3a it is shown that with too large an amount of insoluble
filling material in particulate material 5, drying cannot take place
completely. Because the solvent transport from the component primarily
takes place over the contact points between particles in the printed area
and particles in the surrounding powder bed, the insoluble particles make
it more difficult for the solvent 12 to diffuse after several
millimetres. The powder in this area 11 is completely saturated and
cannot further absorb solvent from the component 7.
[0115] With a system using polyethylmethacrylate particulate material and
polymethylmethacrylate filling material, and a pentanol binder,
saturation occurs after approximately 5 hours. The thickness of the
marginal layer is about 2 mm.
[0116] If there is sufficient soluble particulate material around the
component, the solvent can diffuse unhindered into the material around it
away from the component, and therefore dries. This is shown in FIG. 3b.
[0117] If a pure and soluble polyethylmethacrylate particulate material is
used without filler, the solvent can escape over the surrounding powder
from the component. It dries almost completely within 24 hours.
[0118] A stronger solvent can also be used as a binder, so that even the
filler allows passage of the binder.
TABLE-US-00001
TABLE 1
weight-
No. components percentage/[%]
(5) particle material
(12) base material
PMMA-beads 2-100
(13) initiator
Benzoylperoxid (dissolved in base material) 0.1-5
(14) filler
i.e. metal powder, glass-/carbon fiber, 5-98
insoluble polymer
(22) Binder
(15) monomers
(15a) styrol 0-75
(15b) hydoxyethylmethacrylate 25-100
(16) Cross linker
polyethylenglykol-dimethacrylat 0-50
(17) accelerator/catalyst
N,N-dimethyl-p-toluidin 0.5-1.5
(18) Delayer
p-benzochinon 0-0.3
Formulas
[0119] I(13).fwdarw.2R*(19) 1a
R*(19)+M(15).fwdarw.RM*(20) 1b
RM*(20)+nM(15).fwdarw.RM.sub.n+1* 1c
combination: RM.sub.n*+RM.sub.m*.fwdarw.RM.sub.n+mR(21)
Disproportioning: RM.sub.n*+RM.sub.m*.fwdarw.RM.sub.n+RM.sub.m(21) 1d
[0120] In relation to Table 1 and Formulas 1a-1d the following shows the
process for drying and hardening of a binder based on radical
polymerisation solvent according to a preferred embodiment of the process
in the invention.
[0121] A special benefit is that the particulate material can be
polymethylmethacrylate-based and the binder can be based on various
methacrylates and/or styrols. The functioning of such a powder/liquid
system is shown in Table 1.
[0122] The component is, as already described, to be constructed in a
layered manner from a particulate material and a binder.
[0123] As soon as the binder from the print head meets the particulate
material, the interactions between different parts of the system begin.
[0124] Next, the base material is dissolved 12. This causes the initiator
13 in the base material 12 to float out of the grains. The speed of this
step is determined by the solubility of the base material 12 and the
solvent strength of the binder 22. As shown in Formula 1a, the initiator
13 is split by the accelerator 17 and forms radicals 19.
[0125] These radicals split the double bonds of monomer 15 and react with
monomer radicals 20. This is shown in Formula 1b.
[0126] The addition of further monomers 15 to the monomer radicals 20
forms a macromolecule 21. The choice and composition of the monomer 15
can control the speed of the growth reaction. The growth reaction is
presented in Formula 1c.
[0127] The growth reaction is terminated by the size of the macromolecule.
There are various termination mechanisms described in the literature.
Formula 4e shows breaking of the chain through combination and
disproportionation.
* * * * *